Menu Close

Citizen Assemblies – why have them?

Trust in politics and parties is at an all-time low
We all support the idea of democracy, but Australians have become so disillusioned with political parties that today less than 0.5% of citizens bother to join a party. Funding of parties by vested interests, the favour trading that goes on between them, and the revolving door for staff at high levels from parties and ministerial offices to senior positions in industry and commerce, and then back again, has seriously undermined the objectivity of our representative democracy. It is no longer impartial, and measures to improve our wellbeing and quality of life are constantly trumped by corporate interests depicted as ‘political reality’.

Democracy has been hacked
As Al Gore put it,, representative democracy ‘has been hacked’ by powerful vested interests that now have inordinate influence in public policy making. These interests simply do not care what the public think or want. All that matters to them is growth, profit and returns to their shareholders. Bank rolling political parties, politicians and their election campaign generates expectations of favours in return. An example today is governments in many countries continuing to grant exploration and extraction licences for coal and gas, including Australia, when almost everyone agrees it is deeply harmful in the face of climate change.

Political parties have basically become a mechanism for large vested interests to control the agenda in areas they care about. This is referred to by some as ‘state capture’.

Furthermore, even the best politicians, those with a good understanding of what their electorate really wants, can find themselves overruled by their own party. Their loyalty to the party’s positions on all topics is demanded, regardless of what they or their electorate may think.

Quote from John Dryzek here:

‘Australia’s federal parliament is today … not a deliberative assembly [but] rather a theatre of expression where politicians from different sides talk past each other in mostly ritual performance. Party politicians do not listen, do not reflect and do not change their minds. The same complaint can be made about parliaments and congresses throughout the world…’

https://theconversation.com/the-proposed-senate-voting-change-will-hurt-australian-democracy-55297

The Greek solution

Sortition, involving the random selection of citizens for service in deciding public policy, was fundamental to the governance of Athens in 462-322 BC. It survives today in the use of juries.

The ancient Greeks took a very different approach to governance 2500 years ago. Instead of political parties making government policy – there weren’t any political parties – citizens were selected by lot – ie at random, like a jury is today. With a new selection made each day, assemblies of citizens would carefully deliberate and come to a consensus about an issue – then move on to the next matter. The system was complex, with different randomly-selected assemblies charged with different responsibilities – eg one proposed legislation, while another would debate, amend and finally agree on a version. Magistrates in the legal system were also selected by lot. All 30 000 male citizens were eligible to serve, and were paid for their time. In its final and most advanced form, the system lasted 130 years, before Athens was conquered and its governance system overturned. Versions of the approach survived in Renaissance Italy, not disappearing altogether until about 1800.

Today the principle of power being allocated by lot endures in the Western legal system, where juries are selected at random from the electoral roll. We greatly respect this system, and give it enormous power over the lives of our fellow citizens. A guilty verdict from a jury can lock someone up for life in Australia. In the US it can lead to their execution. Selection by lot is known as ‘sortition’, and we take its inherent integrity and objectivity very seriously. We trust it to deliver justice and real social benefit.

Here then is a way forward for democracy. We have the mechanism. It works and is trusted. We do not need political parties or politicians. Good, paid managers will still be needed to implement policy, but not to develop policy or set spending priorities. Those decisions can made perfectly well and more fairly by impartial citizen assemblies.

In SA, CAFSA is calling for CAs to be used routinely by government in developing important public policy, and in setting spending priorities.

A longer-term goal for SA would be to establish a permanent sortition-based chamber, as now exists in the municipality of Paris, and in the eastern province of Belgium (Ostbelgian). More such chambers are being planned around the world. CAFSA calls upon the State of SA to live up to its reputation for national, indeed global, leadership in social and political reform, and embrace this goal too.

Further reading

Articles
‘It gave me hope in democracy’: how French citizens are embracing people power’
The Guardian – November 2020

https://demnext.substack.com/p/how-a-permanent-citizens-assembly (by the French civil servant who oversaw the process for the city of Paris)

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jan/22/irish-readers-citizens-assembly-worked-brexit (on why the Irish CAs worked so well)

https://isps.yale.edu/news/blog/2024/04/governing-citizens’-assemblies-lessons-from-france-and-beyond

https://www.noemamag.com/a-movement-thats-quietly-reshaping-democracy-for-the-better/ (by Claudia Chwalisz from Democracy Next)

http://citizensassembly.ie/en/about-the-citizens-assembly/recruitment-of-members/recruitment-of-members.html

https://www.publicdeliberation.net/deliberative-minipublics-has-made-it-to-mainstream-politics-a-dispatch-from-belgium/

https://democracyinpractice.org/

https://democracyrd.org/work/

Books

Alexander, J and Conrad, A (2023), Citizens, Canbury Press, UK

Dunlop, T (2018), The Future of Everything, New South Publishing, UNSW, Sydney chpt on Government pp.113-139.

Dunlop, T (2022), Voices of us, New South Publishing, UNSW, Sydney

Fishkin, J S (2009), When the People Speak, OUP, UK

 

Hennig, B (2017), The End of Politicians – Time for a Real Democracy, Unbound, UK

 

Murray CK and Frijters P (2017), Game of Mates – How favours bleed the nation, Australia, ISBN 978-0-6480611-0-6

Smith, P (2023), Rescuing Democracy: How Public Deliberation Can Curb Government Failure, ebook, University of Tasmania
https://figshare.utas.edu.au/articles/book/Rescuing_Democracy_How_Public_Deliberation_Can_Curb_Government_Failure/23042876?file=40784669

Surowiecki, J (2004), The Wisdom of Crowds, Little-Brown publishers, UK

Van Reybrouck, D (2016), Against Elections – The Case for Democracy, Bodley Head, UK

White K, Hunter N, Greaves, K (2022), Facilitating Deliberation – a Practical Guide, Mosaic Lab, contact info@mosaiclab.com.au

Materials produced by CAFSA

U3A lecture 24 Aug 2022.pptx

Talk to Lyceum Club Sept 2024.pptx

ERA talk 30 Nov 2024.pptx